Botkyrka Municipality Awards Accessibility Consultancy Contract to Ekselens AB

Standfirst

Botkyrka Municipality in Sweden has selected Ekselens AB for a SEK 15,000 consultancy assignment to assess planned accessibility improvements at a shop entrance associated with Botkyrkabyggen. The work covers expert review of proposed ramps and automatic door systems, participation during implementation and a final opinion on whether the completed measures comply with applicable requirements. The contract was awarded through a restricted procedure under a dynamic purchasing system for technical consultants, with three tenders received and price identified as the award criterion.

Introduction

Accessibility in existing buildings is both a public service concern and a practical challenge for property owners. Entrances that are difficult to use can restrict access for people with disabilities, older people and other visitors who need step-free routes or automated doors. In this Swedish procurement, concerns were raised about access to a shop entrance, prompting plans for ramps and automatic door equipment. The resulting consultancy assignment focuses on checking those planned measures against applicable requirements and reviewing their implementation.

Botkyrka Municipality conducted the procurement on behalf of Botkyrkabyggen through a renewed competition within the dynamic purchasing system for Technical Consultants 49848, Architects. The award notice records a restricted procedure and identifies price, described as lowest price in the Swedish notice, as the award criterion. This is a specific call-off or competition within an established purchasing arrangement rather than a new framework agreement. The municipality's use of an existing dynamic purchasing system provides a route to source specialist advice for a defined property issue.

The contract is modest in financial terms, with an awarded tender value of SEK 15,000 excluding any unreported additions. Its significance is primarily operational: independent accessibility expertise can help a property owner assess proposed physical changes, oversee implementation and obtain a documented conclusion. For suppliers monitoring the official Tenders Portal, Active Tenders and Live Notices for Tenders, the award also illustrates how smaller consultancy requirements can emerge from practical concerns at individual buildings rather than large capital programmes.

Why This Contract Matters

The immediate issue is whether planned improvements at a shop entrance will provide appropriate access and meet applicable requirements. Ramps and automatic doors can address physical barriers, but their effectiveness depends on design, installation and the relationship between the entrance and surrounding access routes. The contract calls for a specialist to assess the proposed measures, participate during implementation and issue an opinion after completion. These stages connect the initial plan with a final assessment of the work delivered.

For Botkyrkabyggen, the assignment offers a way to obtain specialist review rather than relying solely on the contractor responsible for carrying out the physical changes. An expert assessment can support clearer technical decisions and help identify issues before work is completed. The notice does not specify the exact accessibility standards, the nature of the complaints or whether the entrance has already undergone a technical inspection. Those details would be necessary to assess the original barriers and the expected level of improvement.

The procurement also illustrates the role of small specialist consultancies in local property management. An assignment worth SEK 15,000 can support a decision with direct consequences for building users. The award does not establish that the planned work has already been completed or that the entrance is now compliant. Instead, it records the appointment of a consultant to assess the proposed measures, contribute during execution and provide a final opinion.

Contract Timeline

The contract winner, Ekselens AB, was selected on 8 October 2026. The contract was concluded on 9 October 2026, according to the award notice. The notice was dispatched on 9 October 2026 and published in the Official Journal of the European Union's Supplement series, OJ S 197/2026, on 12 October 2026 under publication number 704084-2026.

The lot's stated start date is 5 October 2026 and its end date is 22 October 2027. The listed start date therefore precedes both the recorded winner-selection date and the contract conclusion date. This is a chronological inconsistency in the published data and should not be silently corrected. The notice does not explain whether the start date represents an intended service period, an administrative entry or another arrangement. The listed duration should consequently be read alongside this caveat.

Contract Overview

The procurement is titled "Konkurrensutsättning av DIS Tekniska Konsulter 49848, Sakkunnig inom tillgänglighet för bedömning av planerade åtgärder - Botkyrkabyggen". It concerns a specialist accessibility consultant engaged through the municipality's dynamic purchasing system for technical consultants and architects. The assignment responds to concerns about access to a shop entrance and planned improvements involving ramps and automatic doors.

The scope has three stated elements: assess whether the proposed measures comply with applicable requirements, participate during the implementation process and provide an opinion after the work is completed. The awarded tender value and the notice's total value of contracts awarded are both SEK 15,000. The estimated value excluding VAT is also SEK 15,000. The notice does not state a separate framework maximum, and it explicitly indicates that no framework agreement is being established through this award. Instead, the procurement uses a dynamic purchasing system that can also be used by buyers not listed in the notice.

Ekselens AB is the successful tenderer, while Nyréns Arkitektkontor Aktiebolag and Just arkitektur Stockholm AB are identified as non-winning tenderers. Each of the three tender values is reported as SEK 15,000. The notice does not explain the distinction between the submitted prices or disclose detailed evaluation scores. Subcontracting is marked as not yet known for all three tenderers, so no definitive statement can be made about the winner's eventual use of subcontractors.

Key Contract Details

Project Scope

The assignment is to provide specialist accessibility advice for planned improvements to a shop entrance associated with Botkyrkabyggen. The notice explains that concerns had been raised about accessibility and that the property organisation planned to introduce ramps and automatic doors. A qualified consultant is to assess whether the proposed measures meet applicable requirements, participate during the implementation and issue a statement once the work is complete.

The recorded place of performance is Stockholms län, Sweden, identified by NUTS code SE110. The notice does not name the individual property, give dimensions of the entrance, provide drawings or identify the precise technical standards to be applied. It also does not state the construction contractor, the cost of the physical accessibility works or whether the consultant must conduct formal measurements or testing. Those details should be confirmed from the underlying procurement documents rather than inferred from the award notice.

About the Contracting Authority

Botkyrka kommun is the contracting authority and a regional authority in Sweden. The notice classifies its activity as general public services. Its listed address is Munkhättevägen 45, 147 85 Tumba, Sweden. Emilia Graff is named as the contact point, and the municipality's website and buyer profile are listed as http://www.botkyrka.se.

The municipality conducted the competition on behalf of Botkyrkabyggen. This distinction matters because the municipality is the buyer named in the TED notice, while Botkyrkabyggen is the property organisation whose planned accessibility measures prompted the requirement. The notice does not give a separate legal entity profile for Botkyrkabyggen in its organisations section, so further corporate details should not be assumed from the notice alone.

About the Organisations Involved

Botkyrka kommun is the buyer, manages the procurement process and is listed as the organisation providing additional information about the procedure. It ran the competition on behalf of Botkyrkabyggen through the dynamic purchasing system for technical consultants.

Botkyrkabyggen is the property organisation for whose benefit the consultancy is being procured. The notice identifies its planned measures at a shop entrance as the reason for the assignment. It is not separately listed as the contracting authority in the notice's organisations section. The record does not provide a separate registration number or address for Botkyrkabyggen.

Ekselens AB is the successful tenderer for LOT-0001 and is classified in the notice as a micro-sized economic operator. Its listed address is C A Reuterswärds Gata 8, 416 48 Göteborg, Sweden. Isaac Ibrahim is the named contact point. The tender identifier is 2, and the contract identifier is Contract 283821 (0001). The company is associated with the awarded value of SEK 15,000.

Nyréns Arkitektkontor Aktiebolag is a non-winning tenderer, identified by tender number 1. The notice lists its address as Box 4709, 116 92 Stockholm, Sweden and gives upphandling@nyrens.se as its procurement contact email. Its tender value is reported as SEK 15,000.

Just arkitektur Stockholm AB is also a non-winning tenderer, identified by tender number 3. Its listed address is Alsnögatan 11, 116 41 Stockholm, Sweden. Fredrika Holm is the named contact point. The notice reports a tender value of SEK 15,000.

Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm is the review organisation and the source of further information about review procedures. The notice directs readers to the procurement documents for review deadlines. It does not report any review request outcome in the information available in this award record.

TED eSender is not named as a specific organisation in the notice content. The record gives a dispatch date and time but does not identify the sending entity. No separate eSender organisation can therefore be reliably attributed.

Procurement Analysis

The municipality used a restricted procedure within a dynamic purchasing system for technical consultants. A dynamic purchasing system allows participating buyers to source services through a defined electronic purchasing arrangement, with individual requirements competed among eligible suppliers. The notice says the system may also be used by buyers not listed in the notice. It does not establish a new framework agreement for this particular assignment.

Three tenders were received, and the award criterion is listed as "Lägsta pris", meaning lowest price. The notice also records the value 2 in a field describing the method to be used if weighting cannot be expressed by criteria. It does not provide an evaluation narrative or technical scoring details. Because all three tender values are recorded as SEK 15,000, the published price data do not distinguish the winner from the two unsuccessful tenderers. It would be unsafe to infer that the bids were identical in all respects or that price data alone fully explain the selection.

The stated procedure and award criteria suggest a price-focused competition for a clearly defined specialist service. In a small consultancy assignment, a price criterion can make the evaluation straightforward where the scope and professional requirements have already been specified. However, the practical quality of an accessibility assessment also depends on competence, independence, understanding of applicable requirements and the ability to document findings. The notice does not explain how these professional capabilities were assessed as qualification requirements or whether any other conditions affected the result.

The equal tender values are a notable data point. The winning and non-winning bids are each listed at SEK 15,000, matching the estimated value and the total awarded value. This may reflect a reporting convention or rounded values, but the notice does not explain it. No discrepancy in the total contract value is evident from the fields supplied, yet the equal values limit the ability to reconstruct the commercial ranking from the published notice. The result should therefore be reported as recorded, without inventing a price difference or evaluation score.

Additional Procurement Facts

The notice cites Directive 2014/24/EU as its legal basis. It states that the procurement project is not financed with EU funds and that the procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). The contract is classified as a service, with main CPV code 71000000 covering architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services.

The notice also lists a broad set of additional CPV classifications covering architectural advice and design, engineering consultancy, construction management, technical testing, safety consultancy, IT consultancy, environmental management and other professional services. This broad classification list is associated with the technical consultant purchasing system and should not be read as evidence that the specific accessibility assignment includes every listed service category. The actual assignment described in the notice is much narrower.

The lot is marked as having no strategic procurement objective. The notice records no framework agreement for this award but confirms that a dynamic purchasing system is used. Subcontracting is marked as not yet known for the winning and non-winning tenderers. These are distinct fields: the notice does not establish that subcontracting will occur, nor does it confirm that it will not.

Market and Industry Perspective

The award reflects demand for targeted professional advice within property maintenance and accessibility improvement. Public and municipal property owners often need to address specific barriers in existing buildings without commissioning a large design or construction programme. In such cases, an independent consultant can help translate user concerns into a technical assessment, check proposed interventions and document the condition after completion. The procurement shows how a relatively small requirement can be sourced through an established dynamic purchasing system rather than a standalone open-market exercise.

For architectural and engineering consultancies, the opportunity is to compete for well-defined specialist assignments where experience and availability can be as important as scale. Businesses monitoring RFPs and RFQs should examine the scope, qualification requirements and award criteria carefully. BOQs may be relevant to associated construction works, but this consultancy notice does not provide a bill of quantities for the ramps or automatic doors. GPNs and procurement portal notices can help firms identify future public-sector demand, while Active Tenders and Live Notices for Tenders provide more immediate visibility into current competitions. Suppliers should not assume that a small consultancy award guarantees a larger works contract.

Economic Significance

The direct financial value of the consultancy contract is SEK 15,000, a limited amount relative to major construction projects. Its economic relevance lies in supporting a decision about how to make an existing entrance more accessible. A specialist review may help the property owner avoid poorly specified work, identify compliance concerns during implementation and create a record of the final condition. The notice does not quantify savings or demonstrate that any particular risk was avoided.

The assignment also illustrates the role of small firms in delivering public-sector technical services. Ekselens AB is classified as a micro-sized operator, showing that the winning supplier is not a large consultancy group according to the notice's size category. However, the award alone does not prove any wider employment effect, local spending multiplier or job creation. The notice marks subcontracting as not yet known and does not provide staffing levels or a breakdown of expenditure. Any wider economic impact will depend mainly on the separately planned physical works and any further requirements, neither of which is valued in this award notice.

Future Procurement Opportunities

Potential related opportunities could arise from the physical implementation of ramps and automatic doors, additional accessibility reviews at other properties or further building consultancy assignments. The notice does not confirm that Botkyrkabyggen will issue a separate works tender or that the consultant's findings will result in additional procurement. Suppliers should treat these as possible follow-on market areas rather than announced projects.

Companies seeking Swedish public procurement opportunities should monitor the official Tenders Portal and relevant municipal procurement channels for Active Tenders, Latest Active Tenders Procurement and Live Notices for Tenders. Searches for accessibility consultancy, building inspection, architectural advice, construction consultancy and property adaptation may identify related requirements. Businesses should also review tender results to understand how dynamic purchasing systems are used and which types of professional services are being sourced. The current award offers evidence of demand for a defined accessibility assessment, not a forecast of a particular future budget.

Opportunities for Suppliers

Specialist accessibility consultants can look for assignments involving entrance audits, ramp design review, door automation, circulation routes and post-completion inspections. Architectural practices and building engineers may also be able to support property owners with surveys, technical drawings and compliance documentation where those services are specified. The strongest bids will connect the consultant's professional experience to the exact scope and explain how findings will be documented for the client.

There may also be opportunities for contractors and niche suppliers of ramps, automatic door systems, access controls and related building components in separate works procurements. Such opportunities are not included as confirmed deliverables in this consultancy award. Logistics providers and installation specialists should look for separate specifications that define equipment, installation, testing and maintenance responsibilities. Since subcontracting is listed as not yet known, the notice does not identify a particular subcontracting opportunity within Ekselens AB's contract.

What Businesses Should Watch

Suppliers should track whether the final accessibility opinion is followed by additional works procurement or similar assignments across the municipality's property portfolio. The notice itself does not disclose the final report, the consultant's technical findings or whether the proposed measures will be accepted without modification. Future notices may clarify the standards, scope and documentation required for comparable accessibility assessments.

Procurement teams should also pay attention to the use of lowest price as the stated award criterion, the equal reported bid values and the contract timeline. The listed start date of 5 October 2026 precedes the winner-selection date of 8 October and contract conclusion date of 9 October. This inconsistency merits clarification in the procurement record. Businesses should check review deadlines in the underlying documents and monitor changes in building accessibility rules and municipal investment plans. For this award, the notice states that the procurement is GPA-covered and not EU-funded.

SwedenTenders.com Procurement Intelligence

This award is a useful example of how public procurement can address a narrowly defined building access problem through a specialist service rather than a large capital contract. The immediate procurement need arose from concerns about a shop entrance, and the response combines technical assessment with participation during implementation and a final opinion. This structure can help the property owner connect design intent with the result delivered on site. The notice does not establish the eventual compliance outcome, so the contract should be treated as an appointment for assessment rather than evidence that the accessibility problem has already been resolved.

The competitive picture is relatively clear in terms of participation: three tenders were received, Ekselens AB won and Nyréns Arkitektkontor Aktiebolag and Just arkitektur Stockholm AB were unsuccessful. Yet the commercial record is less informative because all three tenders are shown at SEK 15,000, the same as the estimated value and the award total. With lowest price listed as the award criterion, the absence of differentiated prices or published scoring means that readers cannot independently reconstruct the decision from the notice alone. This is a limitation of the available record, not proof of an error in the award.

For the wider market, the procurement reinforces the value of monitoring smaller notices alongside high-value infrastructure tenders. Accessibility reviews, building inspections and targeted engineering advice can provide entry points for micro and small consultancies, particularly when a dynamic purchasing system enables competition for specific assignments. Over time, public buyers may face greater expectations for documented accessibility outcomes, user-centred design and clear verification of completed works. Those are broader trends to watch, not additional requirements explicitly confirmed in this notice. SwedenTenders.com users should combine award analysis with current procurement notices and original tender documentation to identify opportunities without treating a single contract as proof of a larger programme.

Supplier Takeaways

• Monitor dynamic purchasing system competitions for specialist accessibility, architectural and building consultancy services.
• Demonstrate relevant experience in accessibility assessment, review of proposed measures and documented post-completion opinions.
• Review the procurement documents for exact qualification requirements, review deadlines and technical standards before preparing a bid.
• Track related Active Tenders and Live Notices for Tenders, while treating possible ramp and automatic-door works as separate opportunities unless formally advertised.

Key Takeaways

• Ekselens AB won the SEK 15,000 accessibility consultancy contract for Botkyrka Municipality on behalf of Botkyrkabyggen.
• The assignment concerns assessment of planned ramps and automatic doors at a shop entrance, participation during implementation and a final opinion after completion.
• Three tenders were received, with lowest price identified as the award criterion.
• The two unsuccessful tenderers were Nyréns Arkitektkontor Aktiebolag and Just arkitektur Stockholm AB, and all three reported tender values were SEK 15,000.
• The notice records a start date earlier than the winner-selection and contract conclusion dates, requiring clarification of the timeline.

Conclusion

The award gives Ekselens AB a defined role in assessing accessibility improvements at a shop entrance associated with Botkyrkabyggen. While the contract value is modest, it illustrates how local authorities use specialist consultancy and dynamic purchasing systems to address practical property access concerns, with the final accessibility outcome still dependent on the assessment and implementation process.

Source: Tenders Electronic Daily (TED), Contract Award Notice 704084-2026, Official Journal of the European Union, published on 12 October 2026.